An argument that is often raised among the head shaking admonishment brigade, is that there is a woeful level of literacy in society. The argument usually points to comments on social media as examples of falling literacy, or to emoji laden messages, or is writ large in speciously reasoned blog posts like this one.

The reality is held within these charts:


Literacy scoreLiteracy rates by school year

Yes, as you can see, for over 200 years the world’s literacy rate has been improving. If you go to the source article at Our World In Data you will be able to highlight the 1870-2010 trends. This shows that even quite well-educated nations have improved their literacy rates.

So what exactly are people complaining about? Well, let’s take some of the examples that are often proffered.

I recently reread a number of pulp novels from the sixties and seventies (with an occasional eighties and nineties thrown in for fun) – not literary fiction by any means, just thrillers the likes of which I grew up reading. What immediately struck me is how erudite the books were compared to modern fare. They were written at a much higher grade level than current popular fiction, because, bluntly, the average person was more literate, and the assumption was that folks wanted a little intellectual stimulation with their car chases and explosions – that words with more than a couple of syllables could be salted through a tome without fearing a slew of one star reviews written in Pidgin English bemoaning that the author was trying too hard or must have once seen a thesaurus. Source.

This is, of course, a personal opinion expressed by the blogger rather than hard data. You only have to look at the above charts to see that the average person they are referring to is actually more likely to be literate now than in the 1960’s. I think the blogger has leapt to the assertion that people are less literate now as an explanation for a style change that has occurred. Or just wants to whine about kids these days. Because what blogger doesn’t want to do that?

Now, why would a style change occur in the last 30 (or more*) years? Interestingly, some research suggested that the way we write changes the style of our writing. With the rise of word processors and computers, writers measurably changed their styles.

But has anything else has changed in that time period that could have impacted writing styles? I’m not sure if these are familiar to people or not, but television, gaming, internet, media, are all more popular now than they were 30 years ago. I.e. books now have to compete with more entertainment than ever. So stylistic changes will occur to capture and keep an audience’s attention, lest it strays from the latest literary masterpiece about a dog caring for its cat with terminal cancer to a YouTube video about how white nationalism is okay now for some reason (because of post-modern cultural marxism apparently).

Has reading and writing (literacy) actually changed much, though? It is one thing to say that people have passed the minimum standard level, but it is quite another thing to suggest high levels of literacy are being achieved by more/less people.

Studies on this were actually hard to come by. Yet there is certainly concern about reading and writing proficiency for high-school and university level students:

Three-quarters of both 12th and 8th graders lack proficiency in writing, according to the most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress. And 40 percent of those who took the ACT writing exam in the high school class of 2016 lacked the reading and writing skills necessary to complete successfully a college-level English composition class, according to the company’s data.

Poor writing is nothing new, nor is concern about it. More than half of first-year students at Harvard failed an entrance exam in writing — in 1874. Source.

Given the last sentence in that quote, it is probably more accurate to say that the standards are changing. We now expect more of our literacy because more people are schooled and meeting basic literacy standards. For example, in the USA Master’s degrees are now as common as Bachelor’s degrees were in the 1960’s. People are expecting more of education and setting different standards than were held previously.

As an article on The Conversation concluded on this topic:

In 1997 academic Paul Brock gave an enlightening address to educators in which he carefully recounted the ways each generation has bemoaned the falling literacy standards of the younger generation whilst laying the blame at the feet of modern educational methods.

Apparently, we’ve been doing this since literacy first became a thing back with the Sumerians some 5,000 years ago.

The problem is not that literacy standards are falling, it is that literacy demands are changing – and we are not keeping up.

Schools have their role to play, and they can up their game in order to keep up with the times. But employers must also realise that workplace literacy is their core work, not a supplementary remedial program, and plan their businesses accordingly. Source.

In other words, declining literacy standards are a perennial myth that people love to complain about. Styles have changed. Literacy demands have changed. But that doesn’t mean things are going backwards. Much like kids these days arguments, we can expect to see these same points raised again and again with no evidence to support their claims. Because if there is one thing that never gets old, it is complaining about how things are different now than the good old days.

*The blogger’s larger post talks about a change occurring in the more recent 20-30 year period, despite referencing books from the 1960-70’s. You’ll also notice more links to evidence in my post… just saying.


8 thoughts on “How literate are we?

  1. The times they are a-changing – thanks to the emerging ranks of people who can read, like stories, and can push the literati out of the way! Viva la revolution! Oh, and keep reading …

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Yes, that’s something I didn’t really comment upon, but a good point. So many of the comparisons that are drawn with past times are with the elite educated people writing for similarly elite educated people and with modern writing aimed at a large audience. A fair comparison for modern thrillers wouldn’t be Robinson Crusoe but drunken sea shanties.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. I completely see the message. Yes we as a world, as a country specifically, have become more literate over the decades. Especially women and people of color have attained more literacy ,where it was not either offered or required a long time ago.

    The trouble I have is, we have a lot of foreign nationals who can’t read a word of English. They obviously can’t write it either. The teaching has fallen to the government and people who are willing to lend a hand.

    I quite remember learning other languages as a teen and how hard that was. From what I understand, English is worse. So, colleges, high schools, social services and the like have stepped in to offer EASL (English As A Second Language) classes to immigrants. Does it help. Not really. Most people learn very short English, but not enough to call them literate.

    So right now we have a figure of 32 million illiterate people in the country today. Most are immigrants. Some are disabled and because of said disability cannot read. Some have never been taught, and sosme have “enough to get by”.

    By and large, the schools have tougher reading requirements in elementary schools. I know it from three children, who have survived to middle and high school. However, from middle school on it’s all pc based. They really don’t do library days, don’t encourage book reports, required reading is not classics anymore, it’s a mess. Common core, thank you very much Bush.

    The fact is, as a parent, we have the privilege and the responsibility to encourage reading if the schools aren’t. Life is so hard without it.

    So, you want to work at KFC your whole life? Learn to read, write, do math and go to college. But that’s another time.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I take it you are in the USA? I’ve heard that education, particularly grade school, is pretty much a case of the haves and have-nots there. Fair comment?

      Immigrants are often a great example of the holes in the system. If they are struggling in an area you can just about guarantee that services are lacking for it. Lack of literacy for immigrants means funding isn’t there for education. Higher crime rates means there is a lack of welfare and job opportunities. Etc. Great litmus test… Well, helpful litmus test, not so great for the people.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. The U.S has the Great Pumpkin for a president. So he dislikes doing anything for immigrants. Literacy is something that will have to wait for a new and better administration.

        Yes, crime is bad here. Immigrants and natural born citizens are criminals alike. It’s a dog eat dog country. In fact, big cities, like where I live, are dangerous hot spots. You can’t go out at night, you can barely go out during the day, there are always police and ambulances, and the emergency rooms are always full. Sad isn’t it?

        I am raising my kids to rise above all that. My two oldest live in a remote desert town in Southern California and my youngest lives with me in the ghetto. I’m going to be moving to rural Oregon by next year to get her away from this and in a better situation.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Hope the move goes well.

        In the blogs I wrote on guns, I was a bit surprised by the violent crime figures for the US. They are over five times the rate we have here in Australia, bigger on some things than others (US murder rate is over 50x higher!!).

        Very strange for a developed country. But then again, we have a better social safety net. And waayyy less guns.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s