Tyson Adams

Putting the 'ill' back in thriller

Who Reads?

creative-bookshelf-design-ideas-43__700

Us readers know how awesome we are. And if we ever socially interacted with people everyone would realise that. We also want to know that we’re not alone. In a holistic sense. Obviously alone in the physical sense because otherwise someone would try to interrupt our reading.

Sensing our need for connection to a nationwide community of book nerds, The Australian Arts Council commissioned a report to figure out who was reading books. The report surveyed 2,944 people to see who read, how much, how they found books, and whether they preferred waiting for the movie adaptation. Let’s see what they found.

Firstly they wanted to establish how often people read and how that compared to other leisure activities. Reading was obviously less popular than dicking around on the internet and watching TV, but apparently beat out exercise. Although they excluded sport, and Aussies have a funny definition of sport. But this finding is similar to 2006 ABS figures that suggest Aussies spend 23 minutes per day reading, versus 21 minutes for sport and outdoor activities, and 138 minutes for Audio/Visual Media (Table 3.3).

Screen Shot 2017-10-08 at 8.28.22 PM

Next are the reader categories. Non-readers were actually a small group, mostly male and more likely to have less education (although I wouldn’t read too much into that last detail). Occasional readers made up half the population, and were defined as reading 1 to 10 books in the last 12 months. Frequent readers were a surprisingly large segment, were defined as reading more than 10 books in a year, and were mostly female, older, better educated, and clearly better looking with tonnes of charisma.

Screen Shot 2017-10-08 at 8.28.32 PM

Screen Shot 2017-10-08 at 8.29.09 PM

Reading is to intellectuals what the bench press is to lifters. On the surface they might appear to be a good representation, but most exaggerate how much to appear better than they really are. Oh, and they generally aren’t fooling anyone… So I’m a little suspicious of the popularity of reading suggested by the above figures.

For one, only 34% of Aussies have visited a library in the last 12 months (2009-2010 ABS data) and 70% of them attended at least 5 times. Yet this new survey suggests 39% of people borrowed one or more books from a library in the last month. That’s roughly comparative figures of 24% from the ABS and 39% from this survey.

I’m suspicious. This survey might not be as representative as claimed. Or reading may have suddenly risen in popularity since 2010…. Doubtful given that both the ABS and this survey suggest otherwise. ABS suggested the the amount of time spent reading had decreased by 2 hours between 1997 and 2006, whilst this survey suggested the book reading times were roughly the same as 5 years ago (Figure 8 – not presented).

The next figure of average reading rates either suggests Aussies are reading quite a bit, or inflating their numbers like an “all you” bench press. The average Aussie is reading 7 hours a week (5 of those for pleasure) and getting through 3 books a month (36 a year: not bad). Occasional readers are reading one book a month from 5 hours a week, compared to the Frequent readers who are reading 6 books a month from 11 hours per week (72 books a year: nice).

Screen Shot 2017-10-08 at 6.24.23 PM

But I’m not sure how accurate these claims are. I cited ABS figures above that suggested Aussies spend 23 minutes per day reading, or 2hrs 41mins (161 minutes) per week. So either one of these two samples is unrepresentative, or some people just love to inflate how much they read. I’m leaning toward the latter.* But you can trust me on my bench press numbers. Totally accurate and “all me”.

The final figure I found interesting was of favourite reading genre. When you included non-fiction and fiction genres there were two clear winners: Crime/Mystery/Thrillers; and Science Fiction/Fantasy.

Screen Shot 2017-10-08 at 6.25.07 PM

These are our favourites yet our bookstores would suggest that Sci-fi and Fantasy are niche and only deserving of a shelf at the back of the store. Cookbooks, memoirs, literature, and the latest contemporary thing that isn’t quite literature but isn’t exciting enough to be genre, are typically dominating shelves in stores. This would annoy me more if I wasn’t already suspicious of how representative this survey was, or how honest the respondents were being.

It could well be that people enjoy reading Thrillers and Fantasy but feel compelled to read other things. Maybe people are brow-beaten by the literary snobs to read only the worthy stuff and not the guilty pleasures. Maybe the snobs in Fort Literature have successfully turned favour against the invading Lesser Works. This might not be the case though, as 51% in this survey say they are interested in literary fiction but only 15% actually read it.

It could be that people are borrowing books from libraries or friends. Borrowing books is popular with 41% borrowing one or more books per month, mostly from friends (43%) and libraries (39%). But 39.5% bought at least one book in the last month (92% of 43% buying for themselves). So the tiny niche sections in bookstores for the most enjoyed genres still doesn’t make much sense.

I’m not sure what to make of all this. I mean, aside from Yay, Reading!

For comparison the USA Pew Research’s 2016 annual survey of readers data is presented below. This suggests that Aussies read more than Americans. Assuming people are being honest.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

“Key” insights from the Aussie research:

•  We value and enjoy reading and would like to do it more – 95% of Australians enjoy reading books for pleasure or interest; 68% would like to read more, with relaxation and stress release the most common reason for reading; and almost three-quarters believe books make a contribution to their life that goes beyond their cost. Over 80% of Australians with children encourage them to read.

• Most of us still turn pages but many are swiping too –  While print books still dominate our reading, over half of all readers in-clude e-books in the mix, and 12% audio books. Most Australians (71%) continue to buy books from bricks-and-mortar shops, while half (52%) are purchasing online. Word of mouth recommendations and browsing in a bricks and mortar bookshop are our preferred ways to find out what to read next. At the same time, nearly a third of us interact with books and reading through social media and online platforms.

•  We are reading more than book sales data alone suggests – each month almost as many people borrow books (41%) as those who buy them (43%) and second-hand outlets are the third most popular source for buying books (39%), after major book chains (47%) and overseas websites (40%). Those who borrow books acquire them almost as frequently from public libraries as they do by sharing among friends.

•  We value Australian stories and our book industry – 71% believe it is important for Australia children to read books set in Australia and written by Australian authors; and 60% believe it is important that books written by Australian authors be published in Australia. While there is a common perception among Australians that books are too expensive, more than half believe Australian literary fiction is important. Almost two-thirds of Australians believe books by Indigenous Australian writers are important for Australian culture.

•  We like mysteries and thrillers best – the crime/mystery/thriller genre is the most widely read and takes top spot as our favourite reading category. We also love an autobiography, biography or memoir. (Source)

* I’m biased toward the ABS survey results over the Australian Arts Council for a few reasons. The first is that the ABS data is part of a larger Time Use Survey (How Australians Use Their Time, 2006, cat. no. 4153.0), so this removes a few biases in how people would answer questions (i.e. ask people specifically about how awesome books are, you’re going to talk up your reading more). It is also the larger survey covering 3,900 households. The methodology was also more likely to produce better data, since respondents were filling in a daily dairy and being interviewed. The Arts Council methodology wasn’t bad, but the survey was developed by interest groups, so the questions were presuming some things.

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

7 thoughts on “Who Reads?

  1. I automatically dismiss anything with less than 5K of people. Not doing that would be akin to going into a bar in Boston and asking about the Yankees [baseball teams, the boston red sox and the new york yankees, that have a history of rivalry with fans willing to beat the snot out of the other if a group finds a straggler in their area].
    It totally skews the outcome and the people/group doing the polling can pre-skew the numbers in the favor of the outcome they want.

    However, it wouldn’t surprise me one tiny bit if Australians read more than Americans. I do my best to bump those male reader numbers up, but I’m only one man and can only read so many books 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • 5k would be a huge survey in Australia, since we have ~10% of the population of the USA. I’m less concerned about the survey size than how representative the survey is. Very easy to get skewed data without some sort of external check.

      Of course, just asking about a topic already has people deciding they need to respond a certain way. Like your example, you ask about baseball teams and people will presuppose they are meant to like baseball more than they do. At least with baseball you can chuck in some factchecks (team history, season results) to see how much people know about it as a measure of respondent reliability.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Good point about population density. Hadn’t even thought of that!
        🙂

        Liked by 1 person

      • I had to chuckle at your reply about paper books not lasting, Tyson. I have books which I re-read every few years from 60 years ago – I’m old enough to have bought them! And they’ve not lived a climate controlled life by any means, plus some have moved from the UK to Australia with me. I regularly read and use reference books that are over 100 years old to get the ‘real’ views of people of that era. It’s digital books etc that don’t last, because the technology changes and then changes again, in my experience. As I said, I buy at least 10 books a month so I’ve done some fair testing of this. I have stopped buying digitally for that very reason. I want to keep and re-read about a quarter of all the books I read.

        Liked by 1 person

      • I like all books.

        But you kept those books inside, right? You looked after them? And even then books fall to pieces – just ask the archivists about this issue. E.g. we have 10 loose pages from a book on our shelves and have no idea which one they fell out of. The glue went and during a reorganisation, those pages broke free of their confines to roam the shelves looking for a new home.

        I don’t see the argument about the superior medium as ever being valid. There are always pros and cons to each.

        Here’s my irreverent take on formats:
        https://tysonadams.com/2017/07/06/reading-format/

        Like

  2. I’m surprised romances came so low on the list, and don’t think this is accurate. If you look at sales, romances are way higher as a percentage. That said, I’m an avid reader, ‘consuming’ at least 10 novels a month, most of which I buy. I don’t go to a library (lovely as libraries are) and I don’t borrow from friends – they borrow from me. I rarely buy ebooks. You can’t beat a ‘real’ paper book. It’s also the best technology. Its ‘battery’ never runs out nor does it break down on me. I have books over 100 years old that I still use in research for my work.

    Happy reading to everyone with the sense to indulge!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I think it is important to remember that:
      1) What people rate as their favourite genre may not be what they read the most of;
      2) What people rate as their favourite genre will be biased by what they feel they expected to answer.

      I’ve mentioned this second point and linked to my previous discussions on “Worthy” and “Guilty Pleasures”. Genre is much maligned.

      I disagree with you on paper being the best tech. It is highly overrated. Cave paintings have the best data retention rate of all the writing technologies. Books, especially the current paper versions, wouldn’t last outside of a climate controlled room for more than a few weeks. Cave paintings are still going strong tens of thousands of years later.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: